![]() Think back to older tools avi days of AutoGK, AviNET. I'll second that(review below)! Most of these converters based on ffmeg have deinterlace option but are quite useless in terms of none works that well, because it ruins a source video in terms off quality. But in the same way, I thank the developers, for the constant updates, and for the development of the project. ![]() ![]() As a user, I suggest developers to review the program's interface, I believe that, due to the range of possibilities, it is possible to integrate a program, with a slightly more friendly interface. Another point of improvement would be the use of filters, especially the part of changing resolutions, man!, it's a painful thing, upscale a video, for example, no matter how much you insert the resolution filter, and change the resolution values ​ ​ (for example I want to change a resolution from 720x540 to 960x720 being the movie, in 4:3 scale), the program just doesn't do it! Even avidemux, with its non-intuitive interface, directs you in an easier way, to change the resolution, and to insert the filters. Another point that bothers me is the "mysterious" crashes, which it has, depending on the output format to choose, the program simply closes without further explanation. However, it is a program for advanced users, who are already used to more advanced compression configurations, so anyone who is an atypical user may feel confused when configuring an output format. I like XMedia Recode because it is one of the few software that works with external codecs that are extremely frequent as codec updates, in addition to offering a multitude of formats. I will be happily using XMedia Recode for quite a few of my encoding jobs going forwards. If the points above were addressed in a future update, it would be a solid 10 from me. That said, overall I have found this a brilliant tool for a big, big job, with a very user friendly interface and learning curve. The only things holding me back from giving XMedia Recode a top rating are as follows:Ī) The GPU accelerated encoding isn't the fastest out there.ī) It doesn't always accurately read the contents of a DVD or BD folder.Ĭ) The inability to passthrough a PGS subtitle track is a pain, meaning any BD encodes need a run through MKV ToolNix to add the subs back in from the original master file. I wanted to retain the interlacing as I prefer to let the playback device do the de-interlacing, and this software makes it a breeze to do so.Īdditionally, I had other material where I only wanted to convert the audio, due to PCM on a mono video soundtrack from the 80's being overkill to say the least, so the option to copy/passthrough the video track was an added bonus. My guess would be to try constant quality RF23 or RF25 and see what you think after comparing them with the WMV files.I've been using XMedia Recode to back up tons of old video material which is interlaced. Maybe grab a copy of MediaInfo and import your WMV file and post a screenshot of what you have so we can see the video file properties. Im not sure what constant RF setting you would use for converting wmv to Avi, but what Avi are you outputting to, if i was you, try h264 in an mp4 container, it has excellent player support.ītw, what resolution, video bitrate, and audio has your WMV source files got ? I now convert to 720/50p mp4 using RF18 in handbrake, and RF23 in XMedia. I believe XMedia uses the ffmpeg x264 encoder where handbrake doesnt, meaning the constant RF settings will be different. With handbrake i can set a constant RF quality of 20 and i get 6Mbps average, if i use RF20 in XMedia my same file is 9Mbps, so i adjust the XMedia RF to 25 and i get almost the same 6Mbps result as handbrake. ![]() I am converting 1080/50p m2ts to 720/50p mp4 but it is still relevant. ![]() Hi, i have been using XMedia myself trying to compare to handbrake, and i noticed one thing with quality preset. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |